HTML is one of the most successful platforms and the secret behind the successful story of HTML is because it has been synonymous with web page and application development during the exponential growth of the internet. Besides, it is a tried and true method for many web developers which is in recent years. Even though there will be many new development tools, but traditional desktop applications will continue to use HTML with few to no drawbacks. However, with so many new platforms out there, there is a possibility of that HTML will be changed with Qt. So, discover more explanation about HTML and Qt by reading the points below.
Is there any Drawbacks of Using HTML?
As we know that smartphone has been more popular than desktop, in fact many applications are build for a wide range of shapes and sizes – traditional desktop applications, web applications running on any device with a browser, mobile apps, embedded systems, Internet of things (IoT) devices, and more.
What are the Benefits of Using Qt vs. HTML?
After explaining about HTML, let’s see other platform which might offer the same or more benefits, such as Qt. Qt is a cross-platform C++ development framework and includes both libraries and tooling for creating complete applications and user interfaces. The declarative QML language designed is used as one of Qt’s design to let developers use one codebase to create high performance and fluid UIs for all their desktop, mobile and embedded devices. With ML, you can create intuitive and ready-made controls, such as buttons, dials, and switches. In this way, you can easily drag and drop on your canvas to make rapid prototypes.
All of the benefits above have made Qt’s QML have gained a substantial market share in the web development coding languages.
What are the scenarios in which it makes more sense to use Qt instead of HTML? What about vice versa?
The increase in embedded devices lends itself to Qt with the exponential growth. In fact, many believe that QML and Qt may be a better choice for embedded development since they are designed to get the most out of limited resources. On the other hand, HTML is more suitable to be used on the web and is easily deployable across desktop and mobile platforms. Furthermore, as many developers are more familiar with HTML in these use cases, then it makes sense to use HTML, especially if your developers do not know C++. Above all, Qt performs better in terms of responsiveness, start-up time, and most importantly it supports a wide range of operating systems and the overall user experience.
So, Does Qt have a realistic chance of unseating HTML as the programming language of choice?
Many developers are debating whether QML could actually replace HTML as a web language. In terms of performance aspect, the possibility is high, but from a practical standpoint, you would need Google to change their approach.
No matter what, when it comes to the development of web applications and pages, HTML will always be a popular programming language. However, as the world is getting mobile, Qt has become a very competitive alternative to HTML, especially when it comes to embedded development. This makes wider options for web developers to choose from the best suit their specific needs.